Quantcast

Harrietstown defends integrity of town clerk

Harrietstown town clerk Patricia Gillmett, center, at a recent meeting of the town board.

Harrietstown town clerk Patricia Gillmett, center, at a recent meeting of the town board. Photo by Andy Flynn.

— Members of the Harrietstown Town Board recently reacted to an accusation in the media that the town had covered up a post-executive session vote regarding a sexual harassment case against the town supervisor.

“There has been no cover-up by Town Clerk Patricia Gillmett,” Councilman Ron Keough said at the board’s March 22 regular meeting. “As a member of the Harrietstown Town Board for nearly 30 years ... I have found her responsible, dedicated, honest and astute about her duties as town clerk.”

On March 12, the Adirondack Daily Enterprise ran an editorial criticizing the Harrietstown Town Board “for effectively covering up what may or may not have been a minor scandal.”

The town's insurance company decided to pay former bookkeeper Brenda LaPierre $30,000 to settle a lawsuit claiming that Supervisor Larry Miller had sexually harassed her at work.

“We don't presume he's guilty, but it's worrisome that the council's vote to approve the settlement did not make it to the meeting minutes initially or when the board approved the minutes two weeks later,” the Enterprise wrote. “Minutes of that vote only appeared recently, after the Enterprise asserted the Freedom of Information Law.”

While the Enterprise editorial did not blame Gillmett by name, it is the town clerk’s job to manage the meeting minutes. Prior to a March 6 report, the Enterprise asked Gillmett for the minutes of the Dec. 30 meeting and received a one-page document that did not include the board’s action after the executive session regarding a vote on the sexual harassment settlement. A second page with the information was accidentally not included in the packet, and the Enterprise did not find out about the second page until last week.

In the meantime, on March 14, the Enterprise retracted some of its March 12 editorial with another editorial titled “We went too far.”

0
Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment