Quantcast

Fire contract stuck on details

The Johnsburg fire district contract was turned down twice during the town board's Feb. 7 meeting.

The Johnsburg fire district contract was turned down twice during the town board's Feb. 7 meeting. Photo by John Grybos.

— North River Fire Chief John Donahue, who's headed the conversation with the town board for the fire district, said a chief steers their department as best he can.

“It's all snap decisions. It's all two o'clock in the morning decisions,” said Donahue.

The lack of an approved contract got to the fire chiefs, and some were markedly upset after the second failure of the meeting.

“There's absolutely no way they're going to get their payment in March,” said Olesheski, who apologized to the firefighters for the delays.

“Every time we come to the town board it's a new issue, it's a new issue,” said Donahue. “Now we've got five more issues.”

The contract identifies the payment due date as March 15, 2011, a figure pointed out as already late by an audience member, and probably indicative of a poorly-crafted contract. The individual departments are due $38,912.65 in March 2012, and $40,000 in March 2013 under the contract.

In other town news:

•Vanselow said the town has identified several new spots to mine sand for the roads, and the town engineer found that approval for a mining permit should only take about four months. This should take care of the looming sand reserve issue.

•FrontStreet's lawyers asked the town to approve their water lines, already OK'd by Johnsburg's lawyer and engineer, and to release some of their construction bonding.

•The Tannery Pond Community Center needs a new compressor for its HVAC system at a cost of $2,500 to $2,800. The board approved the cost.

•The Bluegrass Festival use of the Ski Bowl Park was approved for 2012.

•Highway Superintendent Dan Hitchcock got early approval for posting weight limits on the roads for the freeze/thaw spring cycle.

•Denise Conti and Anne Morse were reappointed to the Library Board of Trustees.

•Water rents were raised by $115 for two buildings that have an apartment that have so far not been charged for.

0
Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment