Quantcast

Residents defeat spending plan in Schroon Lake

SCHROON LAKE-Voters here defeated the 2011-12 spending plan for the Schroon Lake Central School on May 17, according to Interim Superintendent Gerald Blair, sending the proposal back to the School Board of Education for a re-write.

In all, there were 190 yes and 269 no votes for the proposed budget, which totalled $7,352,379. That's an increase of $65,966 - 0.91 percent - from the current spending plan of $7,286,413.

School Board members were determined to keep the spending increase to a maximum of 1 percent. That meant cutting popular programs like cheerleading and junior varsity basketball.

In a move that upset Schroon Lake Teachers Association members, the School Board proposed major changes to personnel to help save money. They were planning on not filling three positions after retirements: a bus driver, a custodian and a secretary. They proposed cutting three positions by one day per week: an art teacher, the director of pupil personnel and an occupational therapist. and three positions were to be cut in half: the instrumental band teacher, the librarian, and the family and consumer sciences (home economics) teacher.

"We tried to cut back on programs and staff and not eliminate them," Blair said May 18, adding that they tried to share cutbacks in departments across the board.

Now it's time to look at the proposed cuts that many voters were against, according to Blair, and adjust cuts while trying to keep tax increases at a minimum.

The proposed tax levy for 2011-12 was $5,862,870. That's a $130,957 increase - 2.28 percent - from the present levy of $5,731,913.

Some people were not happy about cutting cheerleading, and "Music seemed to strike a chord that people were upset over," Blair said.

An unscientific exit poll that district residents Bob and Jane Claus conducted during the vote revealed that more people were against the budget because of program and staff cuts rather than the tax increase.

0
Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment