Court tosses Putnam man's conviction

PUTNAM-A state appeals court has ruled a Putnam man had no role in an under-age drinking party that led to the deaths of two teenagers.

The Appellate Division of state Supreme Court threw out the misdemeanor conviction against Jimmy Joe St. Andrews, but upheld the convictions against his wife, Kellie St. Andrews.

Both had been sentenced to 60 days in Washington County Jail, three years on probation and 100 hours of community service in connection with an April 20, 2008, under-age drinking party at their home.

Following the party, the St. Andrews' son, Dustin St. Andrews, who was then 17, took a group of partygoers on a car ride that ended with a crash that killed Shannon James, 16, of Ticonderoga, and Michaella Lopes, 16, of Enosburg, Vt.

The Washington County district attorney's office said Dustin St. Andrews acted with "depraved indifference to human life" before the crash by driving while intoxicated and under the influence of marijuana and driving 132 mph before his vehicle careened off Route 22 and flipped over several times.

Dustin St. Andrews was convicted of first-degree vehicular manslaughter and is serving a 2 1/2 to 7 1/2-year prison sentence.

The crash prompted an investigation and prosecution of his parents, who authorities said were present for the party.

The St. Andrewses pleaded not guilty and went to trial, but both were convicted of misdemeanor endangering the welfare of a child, and Mrs. St. Andrews was convicted of an additional charge of unlawfully dealing with a child.

Their lawyer on appeal, Robert Winn, argued the evidence against them was insufficient, and that the court should not have allowed the couple to be represented by one lawyer because of the potential conflict of interest between the defendants. Lawyer Mark Major represented them during the trial.

The Appellate Division found there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction of Mr. St. Andrews, finding that the witnesses who testified he was present during the party did not provide sufficient evidence that he was aware under-age drinking was taking place. The indictment against him was dismissed.

Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment