Trustees to appeal court ruling in sewer easement case

He noted that losing the appeal could add to that total.

"I think we really just need to cut our losses and run now," Branch said. "This has the potential of incurring another $100,000 in attorney fees which we could be liable for - that's one half of what we'd have to pay now. To continue on this course is just throwing good money after bad."

"I'm not in favor of it," he added. "I think we really need to cut our losses and run at this point - it's a bad chapter in the history of Saranac Lake and let's put it behind us and move forward."

As the resolution was being discussed, Trustee Allie Pelletieri said he wasn't sure how he would vote.

Pelletieri said he supports the rights of property owners, noting that a win for the village could set a precedent for future eminent domain proceedings. He also said the case was dragging on for too many years and it's time to move forward.

But Pelletieri added that the village can't set precedent for how it takes care of its infrastructure.

"The sewer line was placed there years ago," he said. "I'm willing to bet that before any of these people bought that property that sewer line ran there - so buyer beware."

"And it is the duty and the responsibility of the village to maintain a healthy community with water and sewer," Pelletieri added. "The location, next to the lake, only increases the need for us to take care of it."

Trustee Tom Catillaz was mayor when the case started. He said the village didn't cause any problems for the homes in question - he even went so far as to claim the property owners didn't realize the village was doing work until after the fact.

John McEneany said the village should appeal the decision on whether or not the affected individuals get back their legal fees - otherwise, the village is looking at paying back more than $225,000.

Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment