Quantcast

Petition to revote on Giorgetti Rec Center

RUTLAND - Hold on to your hats. The City of Rutland is gearing up for another controversial bout over the Giorgetti Arena bond-this time, a group of city voters have called for a revote on the controversial recreation center.

A group of Rutland voters called for the revote on the bond late last month. As a result, their petition may force the issue back to the voters in order to decide the fate of the $3.9 million bond.

The TownMeeting Day bond vote would expand the current Giorgetti facilities into a recreation center.

The revote petition was completed in less than two weeks. Many angry registered city voters signed the petition

A petition to trigger a revote on any bond within the City of Rutland first requires signatures from nearly 600 registered voters.

At press time, it appeared revote petitioners had gathered 750 voter signatures by the March 29 deadline.

Rutland City Clerk Henry Heck is the city officials charged with accepting or rejecting the petition.

Heck told reporters last week that he did not remember when the city last had a revote call, howwver, Mayor Christopher Louras said the city's last petition for a revote was over a controversial municipal water fluoridation plan back in 1982.

Heck cautioned that he and his staff will need to inspect all the petition signatures before confirming the result; if the names are all valid, then a special election will be called within 60 days of the petition deadline.

Establishing the authenticity of 750 names is no easy task.

In March, voters closely approved the Giorgetti bond 1,710 to 1,603.

Rutland resident and voter James Mattison, one of the major petitioners of the effort, said the bond was pushed through rapidly for Town Meeting Day.

"This administration complains about potholes, antique sewer systems, and water pipes that are ready to explode," Mattison said.

0
Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment