ELCS board won't budge on budget

ELIZABETHTOWN - Despite cries from dozens of attendants at a May 11 public hearing, members of the Elizabethtown-Lewis School Board gave no indication they would consider revising their budget before it goes to vote May 18.

Nearly 80 people assembled in the school's auditorium, most speaking against a proposal in the budget to cut four-and-a-half teaching positions.

Superintendent Gail Else reviewed the aspects of the proposed budget, which includes a zero-percent tax levy increase.

Else highlighted how a 10-percent reduction in the school's state aid contributed heavily to a $722,000 gap the district needed to fill to avoid any increase in the tax levy. This after the state delayed nearly $400,000 in promised aid earlier this year.

"I think we need to have some grave concern for the sources of our funds," Else said.

Meanwhile, enrollment is expected to continue its steady decline from the past six years, especially in the elementary grades.

"We are kind of getting to the point where we can't really afford what we would like to do," said Else, "so what can you do to make what we would like to do less costly?"

According to Else, reducing four elementary teaching positions and combining classes would bring the average class size to 19 with classrooms ranging between 14 and 25 children. If teaching assistants and aides are included, the student to staff ratio would be seven to one.

Besides cutting staff, the budget freezes salaries for non-instructional staff, including the superintendent.

Still, many in attendance at the public hearing felt the cuts to staff ran too deep.

"We felt the budget cuts were handled inappropriately," said First Grade teacher Robin Jones on behalf of the ELCS Teachers' Association, noting how cost-cutting ideas brought by teachers in budget workshops were seemingly ignored.

"Instead of working together on saving money, heavy cuts were made to faculty," she added.

Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment