Optimism swells in North Creek as Ski Bowl Village, Interconnect move forward

NORTH CREEK - A groundbreaking occurred here Friday for what could eventually be a $200 million development that could transform the economy of northern Warren County.

There were no speeches, no golden shovels.

Instead, there were engineers with transits, workers wielding chainsaws, and men driving earth-moving equipment on a site off Ski Bowl Road.

Friday, contractors for Front Street Development LLC began to clear land and move dirt - in launching an initial phase of Ski Bowl Village at Gore Mountain, an ambitous residential, resort and commercial complex.

Whether FrontStreet builds all it has envisioned in its master plans is uncertain, Johnsburg Town Supervisor Sterling Goodspeed said Tuesday.

He said that FrontStreet was beginning their development project this week by building a road and several townhouses and a gatehouse to the property.

Nearly a dozen or so workers were on the job Friday, Monday and Tuesday, he said, and the developers expect these initial townhouses to be complete by the end of this year.

Goodspeed said the development reflected the optimism in town and the eager anticipation over the Interconnect project linking Gore Mountain with a revitalized North Creek Ski Bowl.

The linkage is expected to not only increase the skiing opportunities at Gore Mountain, but divert thousands of skiers to the ski bowl, close to the amenities of downtown North Creek.

The Interconnect, which links the base of Gore's Burnt Ridge trail with the summit of the Ski Bowl, got a substantial boost this past week.

A lawsuit filed by an environmental group, challenging the state ski resort's development plans - which included clearing land for eight ski trails and constructing four gondolas including links to the Ski Bowl - was rejected by a state judge.

Filed last year by the Residents' Committee to Protect the Adirondacks, the suit namedthe Adirondack Park Agency, the state Department of Environmental Conservation and the Olympic Regional Development Authority as defendants. The group claimed the agencies skirted their own policies and procedures and bypassed state law in approving the development plans.

Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment