Ethics board clears Highway appointment

Opponents of the appointment countered with accusations of "rubber stamping" Hitchcock's decision and expressed frustration regarding the Town's legal liability and potential taxpayer burden should a lawsuit ensue.

During the debate, Hitchcock drew fire from Supervisor Goodspeed for publicly divulging information previously discussed during the Board's "executive session" meetings.

Goodspeed was in turn rebuked by Councilman Arsenault for clarifying Hitchcock's statements and reacting to the public release of sensitive information.

In a subsequent written statement to the News Enterprise, Councilman Vanselow elaborated on his dissatisfaction with the Board's ethics vote.

"As far as I'm concerned, the whole reason for the provision in the town's ethics code that requires town board approval in nepotism hiring situations, is to ensure that the hiring process is absolutely fair, that all applicants have an equal chance at securing the position, and that the person being hired is the absolute best choice, based on the process," Vanselow said.

"In this case, there's not even a semblance of fairness. In fact, there was not even a process. Not a single (other) applicant was interviewed. Not a single phone call was made. Not a single reference was checked. Instead, a choice was made to disregard all of the other applicants in favor of the Highway Superintendent's brother-in-law.

"All of us who enter into public service have an obligation to ensure that every official decision we make is ethically based. In voting to confirm this choice in the face of a glaring lack of a fair process, the Johnsburg Town Board has failed to fulfill that obligation."

The Board resolution to allow the appointment was forwarded by Councilman Stevens, seconded by Councilman Arsenault, and supported by Councilman Morehouse.

Councilman Vanselow and Supervisor Goodspeed represented the two dissenting votes.

But a quiet resolution to the issue would appear to be elusive as several new posters were observed in the community late this week. They charge Hitchcock with "nepotism" and severely criticize his decision to move forward with the appointment.

An anonymous source close to the issue also informed the News Enterprise that a grass-roots campaign against the appointment will soon be online with a website and "Johnsburg Board Watch" blog.

Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment